Glue Network
  • 👋Welcome to Glue
  • 📚White Papers
    • 📚White Papers
    • 📕White Paper: Technology Stack
      • Technology Selection
      • Advantages of the Use-Case Optimised Model
      • Layer 1 Driven Layer 2 Development
      • Divorcing Security from Censorship Resistance
      • Cross-Consensus Messaging (XCM)
        • Use Case Example: Building a Multi-Layered dApp with XCM
      • Unified Token Model
      • Building a Robust Ecosystem of Service Providers
      • Strategic Enhancements to the Protocol
      • Recap of Key Innovations and Strategic Enhancements
    • 📘White Paper: Decentralized Application Stack
      • Goals of the Glue dApp Stack
      • Aggregation Strategy: The Glue Hub
      • Glue dApp Development Strategy: A Proactive and Integrated Approach
      • Initial dApps in the Glue Ecosystem
      • Deployment Order of Protocols
        • Deployment Phases
      • Glue's Total Value Locked Philosophy: Prioritising Utility and Stability
      • Governance Tokens and Incentives
      • Distribution Mechanism for DEX and Lending Protocol Tokens
      • Recap of Key Components
    • 📗White Paper: Service Layer
      • Custody
      • Services
        • Subscription Models
        • Service Example
      • A New Standard for DeFi
    • 📙White Paper: Governance
      • Governance and Treasury Management
      • Summary of Glue's Capital Raising Efforts
      • Valuation and Token Distribution
      • Founders Tokens
      • Foundation Allocation
      • Genesis Token Allocations
      • Strategic Capital Allocation and Future Growth Plans
      • Avoiding Traditional Pitfalls
      • Decentralised Treasury Management
      • Future Role of the Glue Foundation
      • Addressing Potential Concerns and Educating Token Holders
  • 👨‍🏫Learn About Glue
    • 🔎Understanding Glue
    • 🔎Glue's Technology
    • 🔎Glue Layer 1 Validation
    • 🔎Glue's Use-Case Optimized L2s
    • 🔎Glue's Security
    • 🔎Glue's Service Layer
    • 🔎Glue Hub
    • 🔎How Does Glue Compare?
    • NOT a Roadmap
    • 🔬Glue Audit
    • 🪙Tokenomics At Genesis
    • Glue Token Sale
  • 🖥️GLUE MAINNET
    • Bonus Vaults
      • Seed/Angel & LBP Participants
      • Public Presale Participants
    • 🌊Provide Liquidity on Glue
    • 🏦Glue Lend
    • 📃$GLUE Token Contract
    • How to Buy $GLUE
  • 💻Glue AlphaNet
    • 🥽Welcome to Glue AlphaNet
      • Glue Blockchain Explorer
      • Faucet
      • 🔎AlphaNet FAQ
      • 👨‍🔬AlphaNet User Guide
        • 📊My Portfolio
        • 💱Buy & Sell Crypto
        • 🛒Market
        • 💰Earn
        • 🏧Transfer & Pay
        • 📜Transaction History
        • 🧰Tools
  • 🏁Glue Quest
    • 🆕Onboarding Quests
    • 💹Trade Quests
    • 💰Earn Quests
    • Transfer & Pay Quests
  • 📣About Glue
    • 👨‍💼Glue Team
    • Glue AMAs
    • 🤝Partnerships
    • 🔗Official Links
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. White Papers
  2. White Paper: Service Layer

Custody

Neo-banks, despite their modern interfaces and improved customer service, still suffer from a fundamental downside: they hold custody over the funds they manage on behalf of users. This centralised custody necessitates extensive regulations to ensure that user funds are protected, and while many of these rules are reasonable, they stem from the inherent risks associated with centralised control of assets.

Traditional banks and neo-banks are required to follow a myriad of regulations designed to protect user funds. These regulations are essential because users have limited visibility into how their funds are managed. The risk of theft, misappropriation, or mismanagement by the bank necessitates strict oversight and controls. This regulatory burden contributes to the high costs of banking services, often making them inaccessible to low-income individuals around the world.

Crypto offers a revolutionary solution to the custody problem by decentralising it. In the crypto world, custody is handled by the blockchain itself. This means:

  1. Transparency and Trust: The blockchain provides a transparent ledger where all transactions are recorded and can be verified by anyone. This eliminates the need for users to trust a centralised entity with their funds.

  2. Reduced Regulatory Overhead: Because the blockchain handles custody in a decentralised manner, many of the regulations designed to protect users from centralised mismanagement are no longer necessary. This significantly reduces the overhead costs associated with traditional banking.

  3. Global Accessibility: By reducing the need for heavy regulatory compliance and centralised control, decentralised custody makes financial services more accessible to people around the world, particularly those in low-income regions who are often excluded from the traditional banking system.

However, decentralisation alone does not address all user needs. While crypto has achieved decentralised custody, the lack of user-friendly services has hindered widespread adoption. Users still require the ease of use, customer support, and additional services that traditional banks provide.

Glue aims to bridge this gap by combining the best of both worlds:

  • Decentralised Custody: Ensuring that the security and transparency of user funds are maintained by the blockchain and DeFi protocols.

  • Comprehensive Services: Offering the same level of customer support, financial advisory, and insurance services that users expect from traditional banks.

By leveraging the decentralised nature of blockchain for custody while providing a suite of user-friendly services, Glue seeks to create a financial ecosystem that is secure, efficient, and accessible to all. This approach not only solves the issues inherent in traditional banking but also addresses the shortcomings of existing crypto solutions, paving the way for broader adoption and a more inclusive financial system.

User Flexibility

Glue offers users the flexibility to select services a la carte, making it more efficient than traditional finance where services are often bundled with custody. If a user is dissatisfied with their current customer support, they can easily switch to a better provider. Should a user decide to opt out of a service entirely, they can do so on chain without the hassle of contacting the provider directly.

PreviousWhite Paper: Service LayerNextServices

Last updated 10 months ago

📚
📗